Case study

Case study: a Scottish farm recovers a €14,000 backpayment

Daily HerdLine figures from the discharge line showed the buyer's April results were wrong. The farm challenged them — and got the money back.

Case study22 October 2026Brolis HerdLine

A dairy farm in Scotland runs the HerdLine Discharge Line Kit on its milk discharge line. When the buyer's results suddenly dropped, the farm had its own record of every litre — and used it.

The situation

Like every dairy farm, it is paid on fat and protein from the buyer's tank samples. Since 28 January 2026 HerdLine has measured the composition of the milk going to the tank every day.

What the data showed

From late January to early April the buyer's results followed the HerdLine figures closely. Then, in April 2026, two results came back far below normal:

3.76 %buyer's fat result, 10 April
3.29 %buyer's fat result, 13 April
3.12 %buyer's protein result, 13 April

Over the same days HerdLine, measuring every litre of the same milk, showed a steady 4.2–4.4 % fat and 3.5 % protein. Nothing on the farm had changed.

HerdLine daily composition vs the buyer's tank results, Scottish farm, January–April 2026From late January to early April the buyer's results follow HerdLine closely. On 10 and 13 April the buyer reported 3.76 % and 3.29 % fat and 3.12 % protein, while HerdLine showed 4.2–4.4 % fat and 3.5 % protein.

Fat / protein, %. HerdLine on the discharge line from 28 January 2026; buyer's results as received by the farm.

The result

With a documented, independent record of its own milk, the farm challenged the composition it had been paid on. The milk buyer made a €14,000 backpayment — more than the cost of the analyser.

Why it matters for dealers

The proposition is simple: know what you are paid for. HerdLine readings are management data, not the legal payment figure — but they make differences visible, and documented.